The aims of this study were to assess the factor structure of a new instrument for the measurement of intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load in a Bosnian sample, to determine the internal consistency of this instrument and to determine whether the instrument predicts learning outcomes. The participants were 75 undergraduate students from the Department of Psychology, University of Sarajevo. Data was collected using the Questionnaire for the Measurement of Intrinsic, Extraneous and Germane Load developed by Leppink, Pass, Van der Vleuten, Van Gog & Van Merrienboer [15] and a Brief Test of Knowledge developed for the purpose of the present study. Results of a confirmatory factor analysis support a three-dimensional model, with the item loadings in the expected manner. The factor structure obtained in our study is consistent with the factor structure reported by Leppink et al. [15]. In addition, the scale items showed good internal consistencies. The results obtained in our study suggest that low intrinsic in combination with high germane scores contribute to learning outcome. High complexity of learning material in combination with not well-organized prerequisite knowledge causes lower investment of germane cognitive resources, i.e. learning process, and consequently lower learning outcome. Overall, despite a relatively small sample size, the results of our study show a clear three-factor structure that corresponded to intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load. The questionnaire could be an important instrument for research practice in domain of CLT. Moreover, the instrument has significant practical value. Educational practitioner can use the instrument in researching and planning their teaching to maximise learning.

The surface of textile materials is highly textured, commonly in non-uniform ways. Because of this texture effect, textile surface appears rougher and more porous than other printing substrates, which can cause excessive ink penetration during printing process. Next, washing process is very important factor because it influences ink characteristics on printed samples as well as structural changes of the textile substrate. The aim of this paper is to determine the influences of washing process and different mesh tread count used for printing on print quality. This will be obtained by using spectrophotometric analysis, and GLCM image processing method for print mottle estimation. The results of this research show that increasing number of washing processes leads to higher color differences reproduction color in comparison to printed materials before washing. It also shows that textile surface texture has a great influence on print mottle as well as that number of washing treatment series can generate variations of solid-tone print uniformity.

Background/Aim Pharmacists' competence represents a dynamic framework of knowledge, skills and abilities to carry out tasks, and it reflects on improving the quality of life and on patients’ health. One of the documents for the Evaluation and Competency Development of Pharmacists is the Global Competency Framework (GbCF). The aim of this study was to implement the GBCF document into Serbian pharmacies, to perform assessment and self assessment of the competencies. Methods The assessment and self-assessment of pharmacists’ competencies were performed during the period 2012−13 year in eight community pharmacy chains, in seven cities in Serbia. For assessment and self-assessment of pharmacists competencies the GbCF model was applied, which was adjusted to pharmaceutical practice and legislation in Serbia. External assessment was conducted by teams of pharmacists using the structured observation of the work of pharmacists during regular working hours. Evaluated pharmacists filled out the questionnaire about demographic indicators about the pharmacist and the pharmacy where they work. Results A total of 123 pharmacists were evaluated. Pharmacists’ Professional Competency Cluster (KK1) had the lowest score (average value 2.98), while the cluster Management and Organizational Competency (KK2) had the highest score (average value 3.15). The competence Recognition of the Diagnosis and Patient Counseling (K8), which belonged to the cluster KK1, had the lowest score (average value for assessment and self-assessment were 2.09, and 2.34, respectively) among the all evaluated competencies. Conclusion GbCF might be considered as an instrument for the competencies' evaluation/selfevaluation and their improvement, accordingly.