A conservacao de celulas e tecidos somaticos possui um papel importante para a preservacao da biodiversidade, otimizacao em manejos reprodutivos e sistemas terapeuticos. Isso e possivel atraves do aperfeicoamento de tecnicas de criopreservacao e uso desse material genetico em outras biotecnologias reprodutivas, como a transferencia nuclear (clonagem). Nesse contexto, faz-se necessario uma analise precisa da amostragem biologica apos a criopreservacao, avaliando a viabilidade e, consequentemente, a eficiencia da tecnica de criopreservacao empregada. Assim, essa revisao objetiva abordar as varias estrategias empregadas na determinacao da eficiencia dos metodos de criopreservacao de celulas e tecidos somaticos, enfatizando seus aspectos teoricos e praticos em algumas especies de mamiferos.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the risk factors for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) following colectomy for colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective study we analyzed 284 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer at the Department of Surgery University Clinical Center Tuzla in the period from 1st January 2009 until 31st December 2014. All patients underwent open colectomy. The length of follow up was from 6 months to 6 years (median follow up 3 years and 6 months). The study included all patients who underwent surgery due to colon cancer. The study excluded patients with postoperative small bowel obstruction after colon cancer surgery with different comorbidities. RESULTS In the analyzed sample of 284 patients, a small bowel obstruction occurred in 13.7% patients after surgery for colon cancer. The highest correlation of risk factors and the occurrence of postoperative small bowel obstruction after colectomy for colorectal cancer in multivariate regression analysis was found to be for Tumor-Node-Metastasis ≥3 (or =3.680), and postoperative complications (or =30.683). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative SBO have many causes, but in this study the highest risk factors were the Tumor-Node-Metastasis ≥3, and postoperative complications.

OBJECTIVE The aim is to determine SAPS II and APACHE II scores in medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients, to compare them for prediction of patient outcome, and to compare with actual hospital mortality rates for different subgroups of patients. METHODS One hundred and seventy-four patients were included in this analysis over a oneyear period in the MICU, Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo. The following patient data were obtained: demographics, admission diagnosis, SAPS II, APACHE II scores and final outcome. RESULTS Out of 174 patients, 70 patients (40.2%) died. Mean SAPS II and APACHE II scores in all patients were 48.4±17.0 and 21.6±10.3 respectively, and they were significantly different between survivors and non-survivors. SAPS II >50.5 and APACHE II >27.5 can predict the risk of mortality in these patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the clinical values of SAPS II vs APACHE II (p=0.501). A statistically significant positive correlation was established between the values of SAPS II and APACHE II (r=0.708; p=0.001). Patients with an admission diagnosis of sepsis/septic shock had the highest values of both SAPS II and APACHE II scores, and also the highest hospital mortality rate of 55.1%. CONCLUSION Both APACHE II and SAPS II had an excellent ability to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors. There was no significant difference in the clinical values of SAPS II and APACHE II. A positive correlation was established between them. Sepsis/septic shock patients had the highest predicted and observed hospital mortality rate.

This study aims to present evidence of censorship during World War II by the Independent State of Croatia of one of its public health officials, Dr. Stanko Sielski who was a physician trained in epidemiology and public health. During World War II, he directed the Institute for Combating Endemic Syphilis in the Bosnian town Banja Luka. The staff under his direction consisted solely of Jewish physicians. We analyzed two groups of envelopes either sent by or to Dr. Stanko Sielski during the War and found evidence of censorship only in communications with a Jewish physician dated towards the end of the War. Dr. Stanko Sielski would be posthumously recognized for his efforts to shield his Jewish colleagues. CONCLUSION The newly available, but still limited data, which we present indicates efforts to censor Dr. Stanko Sielski's postal communications towards the War's end. The censors targeted specifically Dr. Stanko Sielski's correspondences with the Jewish physicians he was protecting. This material highlights the many challenges his public health service experienced during the time of armed conflict.