U višestoljetnom razvoju parlamentarizma i predstavničke demokratije parlamenti su predstavljali ključne institucije borbe za demokratiju i ljudska prava. Uloga parlamenata je posebno značajna u zemljama postsocijalističke tranzicije koje nemaju dugu demokratsku tradiciju. Parlamentarna skupština Bosne i Hercegovine čini centralnu instituciju predstavničke/parlamentarne demokratije u Bosni i Hercegovini. Osobina neposredne povezanosti parlamenta i građana instituciji Parlamentarne skupštine Bosne i Hercegovine daje poseban i veći demokratski značaj od drugih institucija političke vlasti. Iskustva drugih država pokazuju da su za upostavljanje i funkcionisanje demokratskog i uticajnog parlamenta potrebne odgovarajuće društveno-ekonomske, političke i kulturne pretpostavke, kao što su: društvena homogenost u pogledu temeljnih vrijednosti, razvijeno civilno društvo, te odgovarajući stepen konsenzusa i integralnosti unutar paralementarnih stranačkih elita. U kojoj mjeri je Parlamentarna skupština Bosne i Hercegovine učinkovita u ostvarivanju predstavničke i nadzorne funkcije? Kako ostvaruje funkciju legitimnosti i učinkovitosti u donošenju zakona i rješavanju društvenih konflikata? Da li je Parlamentarna skupština Bosne i Hercegovine kao najviši zakonodavni organ stvarni nosilac parlamentarne suverenosti? Kakva su iskustva razvoja parlamentarizma i predstavničke demokratije u postdejtonskom političkom razvoju države Bosne i Hercegovine? To su osnovna pitanja koja su predmet elaboracije u ovom radu. Obzirom da političke institucije oblikuju i političku kulturu, cilj ovog rada je i dopuniti određene prijedloge za izmjenu izbornog zakonodavstva kako bi Parlamentarna skupština Bosne i Hercegovine učinkovitije ostvarivala ustavne nadležnosti i svoju demokratsku funkciju.

The paper deals with the analysis of feminists' arguments about the sex/gender dichotomy within the relationship to trans activism. In the first part of the paper, we will give the usual definitions of sex and gender in feminist literature and the views of feminists on trans activism. Next, we will explain which trans activists' views feminists disagree with, and how language is used for ideological purposes. The aim of this paper is to identify the basic dilemmas and bioengineering associated with the underestimation of biological sex, that is, with the opinion of trans activists that men who are trans women are also women. The author will explain why feminists believe that this approach to the sex/ gender dichotomy is a threat to women's rights in the society.

U ovom radu bavit ću se pita­njem pozicioniranja muslimanskih rezolu­cija u savremenom kontekstu nenasilnog otpora tokom Holokausta. U studijama genocida pitanje nenasilnog otpora često se koristi kao pozitivan primjer pojedinaca koji su se suprotstavili počiniocima zlo­čina. Fenomen muslimanskih rezolucija se, uz odgovarajući historijski kontekst, može smatrati jednim od najboljih primjera nenasilnog otpora na teritorijama okupi­rane Evrope. Bez želje da se uspostavlja mit o jedinstvenosti, jer postoji bezbroj drugih primjera hrabrosti širom Evrope, ove rezolucije se ipak mogu posmatrati kao zaseban fenomen. Odlikovao ih je or­ganizovaniji kvaziinstitucionalni karak­ter s ciljem ne samo osuđivanja zločina i ograđivanja od njih nego i ukazivanja na stradanja vlastitog naroda. Ujedno, imale su veliki značaj i u poslijeratnom periodu u Jugoslaviji, naročito za pitanje nacionalne afirmacije Muslimana. Uvažavajući značaj ovih rezolucija za šire evropsko pamćenje Holokausta, potrebno ih je učiniti dostup­nim stranoj publici. U vezi s tim, Institut za islamsku tradiciju Bošnjaka, u saradnji s američkim Univerzitetom Shenandoah, pokrenuo je 2020. godine istraživački pro­jekat pripreme publikacije s ciljem popu­lariziranja muslimanskih rezolucija. U ovom radu nastojat ću ponuditi adekvatan odgovor na pitanje gdje smjestiti musli­manske rezolucije u savremenim kontek­stima u odnosu prema stranoj publici.

Multiple socio-political and economic factors have grad-ually led to widespread neglect, decline, misuse, and loss of public spaces in Sarajevo. The clash between private and public interests has left physical traces in the city, recalling the importance of Lefebvre’s notion of the right to the city. In the context of the contemporary urban development of Sarajevo, this is translated into the right to shape, use, recycle, and reactivate the city’s neglected shared spaces. As implied by the title of this article, the key question addressed is to whom public space really belongs. This research proceeds from the identification of the key issues of degradation of public spaces, followed by the valorization of mainstream planning approaches and occasional bottom-up initiatives. It is argued that one of the key origins of the problem lies in dispersal and the lack of pertinent geospatial data on public spaces, as well as in the dissonance between all the relevant stakeholders. This article establishes a methodology for introducing a comprehensive, open, and interactive geospatial database as a platform for strategic planning, design, development, and maintenance of urban public spaces.

The environment in which the decision-making process takes place is often characterized by uncertainty and vagueness and, because of that, sometimes it is very hard to express the criteria weights with crisp numbers. Therefore, the application of the Grey System Theory, i.e., grey numbers, in this case, is very convenient when it comes to determination of the criteria weights with partially known information. Besides, the criteria weights have a significant role in the multiple criteria decision-making process. Many ordinary multiple criteria decision-making methods are adapted for using grey numbers, and this is the case in this article as well. A new grey extension of the certain multiple criteria decision-making methods for the determination of the criteria weights is proposed. Therefore, the article aims to propose a new extension of the Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and PIvot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) methods adapted for group decision-making. In the proposed approach, attitudes of decision-makers are transformed into grey group attitudes, which allows taking advantage of the benefit that grey numbers provide over crisp numbers. The main advantage of the proposed approach in relation to the use of crisp numbers is the ability to conduct different analyses, i.e., considering different scenarios, such as pessimistic, optimistic, and so on. By varying the value of the whitening coefficient, different weights of the criteria can be obtained, and it should be emphasized that this approach gives the same weights as in the case of crisp numbers when the whitening coefficient has a value of 0.5. In addition, in this approach, the grey number was formed based on the median value of collected responses because it better maintains the deviation from the normal distribution of the collected responses. The application of the proposed approach was considered through two numerical illustrations, based on which appropriate conclusions were drawn.