AbstractBackgroundMelanoma of unknown primary site (MUP) is not a completely understood entity with nodal metastases as the most common first clinical manifestation. The aim of this multicentric study was to assess frequency and type of oncogenic BRAF/NRAS/KIT mutations in MUP with clinically detected nodal metastases in relation to clinicopathologic features and outcome. Materials and MethodsWe analyzed series of 103 MUP patients (period: 1992–2010) after therapeutic lymphadenectomy (LND): 40 axillary, 47 groin, 16 cervical, none treated with BRAF inhibitors. We performed molecular characterization of BRAF/NRAS/KIT mutational status in nodal metastases using direct sequencing of respective coding sequences. Median follow-up time was 53 months. ResultsBRAF mutations were detected in 55 cases (53 %) (51 V600E, 93 %; 4 others, 7 %), and mutually exclusive NRAS mutations were found in 14 cases (14 %) (7 p.Q61R, 4 p.Q61K, 2 p.Q61H, 1 p.Q13R). We have not detected any mutations in KIT. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 34 %; median was 24 months. We have not found significant correlation between mutational status (BRAF/NRAS) and OS; however, for BRAF or NRAS mutated melanomas we observed significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) when compared with wild-type melanoma patients (p = .04; 5-year DFS, 18 vs 19 vs 31 %, respectively). The most important factor influencing OS was number of metastatic lymph nodes >1 (p = .03).ConclusionsOur large study on molecular characterization of MUP with nodal metastases showed that MUPs had molecular features similar to sporadic non-chronic-sun-damaged melanomas. BRAF/NRAS mutational status had negative impact on DFS in this group of patients. These observations might have potential implication for molecular-targeted therapy in MUPs.

Abstract Background Cerebellar glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is rare and presents with increased intracranial pressure and cerebellar signs. The recommended treatment is radical resection, if possible, with radiation and chemotherapy. Clinical Presentation A 53-year-old man presented with hypertensive cerebellar bleeding and a 2-day history of severe headaches, nausea, vomiting, gait instability, and elevated blood pressure. Computed tomography (CT) showed a left cerebellar hematoma with no obstruction of cerebrospinal fluid and no hydrocephalus. CT angiography showed no signs of pathologic blood vessels in the posterior cranial fossa. The patient was observed in the hospital and discharged. Subsequent CT showed complete hematoma resorption. Two weeks later, he developed headaches, nausea, and worsening cerebellar symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a 4-cm diameter tumor in the left cerebellar hemisphere where the hemorrhage was located. The tumor was radically resected and diagnosed as GBM. The patient underwent radiation and chemotherapy. At a follow-up of 1.5 years, MRIs showed no tumor recurrence. Conclusion Hypertensive cerebellar hemorrhage may be the first presentation of underlying tumor, specifically GBM. Patients undergoing surgery for cerebellar hemorrhage should have clot specimens sent for histologic examination and have pre- and postcontrast MRIs. Patients not undergoing surgery should have MRIs done after hematoma resolution to rule out underlying tumor.

Aim: To show a case report of mental health consequances of a felow who survived Trauma brain injury (TBI) with commotio cerebri that was not properly diagnosed in the first emergency medical examination and harm that he and his family suffer because of lack of knowledge and ethics of medical, economic and judical authorities. Case report: A twenty-six year old male survived a traffic accident that caused TBI. He was misdiagnosed during the emergency examination. Because of that (and other factors) he has not returned to his previous level of functioning. After he treated in the Department of Psychiatry, he went back to his environment a sick leave council interrupted his sick leave, showing mistrust to him and his condition and towards the discharge diagnoses from the Department of Psychiatry. The council sent him to his job without occupational rehabilitation that was recommended. As he could not work in his full capacity, the authorities from his job discharged him on January 2012. When he was on the trial for getting his compensation because of health damages the insurance health expert denied his sufferings and all mental consequences of the commotio cerebri because it was not diagnosed on the first examination in the evening of the accident. So the destiny of this young fellow is very questionable in perspective because of lack of knowledge and ethics of medical staff who are not responsible regarding Hippocratic oath and of industry management who do not take adequate care about their workers who survive traffic accident on the way back to home from their job and who continually suffer because of health particularly mental health consequences. Conclusion: The TBI is an important health public problem and the hospital must establish a perfect managemet in this patients for avoid Mental Changes of Commotio Cerebri.