Simple Summary Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is the most common form of vulvar malignancy, and its incidence has increased in recent years. For better diagnosis and prognostication, and to expand available treatment options, molecular characterization of VSCC is crucial. We sought to identify aberrations in DNA methylation in VSCC, as this has been implicated in the development of several cancers. To this end, we performed genome-wide methylation sequencing on a set of VSCC and normal vulvar tissue using the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array. We detected 199 genes to be differentially methylated in VSCC compared to normal vulvar tissue. Of these, 194 genes were hyper-methylated, which leads to a loss of function of the genes. As most of these genes are involved in transcription regulator activity, our results suggest that disruption of this process plays an important role in VSCC development. Abstract DNA methylation is the most widely studied mechanism of epigenetic modification, which can influence gene expression without alterations in DNA sequences. Aberrations in DNA methylation are known to play a role in carcinogenesis, and methylation profiling has enabled the identification of biomarkers of potential clinical interest for several cancers. For vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), however, methylation profiling remains an under-studied area. We sought to identify differentially methylated genes (DMGs) in VSCC, by performing Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip (Illumina) array sequencing, on a set of primary VSCC (n = 18), and normal vulvar tissue from women with no history of vulvar (pre)malignancies (n = 6). Using a false-discovery rate of 0.05, beta-difference (Δβ) of ±0.5, and CpG-island probes as cut-offs, 199 DMGs (195 hyper-methylated, 4 hypo-methylated) were identified for VSCC. Most of the hyper-methylated genes were found to be involved in transcription regulator activity, indicating that disruption of this process plays a vital role in VSCC development. The majority of VSCCs harbored amplifications of chromosomes 3, 8, and 9. We identified a set of DMGs in this exploratory, hypothesis-generating study, which we hope will facilitate epigenetic profiling of VSCCs. Prognostic relevance of these DMGs deserves further exploration in larger cohorts of VSCC and its precursor lesions.

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have changed the treatment landscape for many cancers, but also cause severe inflammatory side effects including enterocolitis. CPI-induced enterocolitis is treated empirically with corticosteroids, and infliximab (IFX) is used in corticosteroid-refractory cases. However, robust outcome data for these patients are scarce. Methods We conducted a multicenter (six cancer centers), cohort study of outcomes in patients treated with IFX for corticosteroid-refractory CPI-induced enterocolitis between 2007 and 2020. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 0 for diarrhea at 12 weeks after IFX initiation. We also assessed cancer outcomes at 1 year using RECIST V1.1 criteria. Results 127 patients (73 male; median age 59 years) were treated with IFX for corticosteroid-refractory CPI-induced enterocolitis. Ninety-six (75.6%) patients had diarrhea CTCAE grade >2 and 115 (90.6%) required hospitalization for colitis. CFCR was 41.2% at 12 weeks and 50.9% at 26 weeks. In multivariable logistic regression, IFX-resistant enterocolitis was associated with rectal bleeding (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.80; p=0.03) and absence of colonic crypt abscesses (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.13 to 8.05; p=0.03). Cancer non-progression was significantly more common in patients with IFX-resistant enterocolitis (64.4%) as compared with patients with IFX-responsive enterocolitis (37.5%; p=0.013). Conclusion This is the largest study to date reporting outcomes of IFX therapy in patients with corticosteroid-refractory CPI-induced enterocolitis. Using predefined robust endpoints, we have demonstrated that fewer than half of patients achieved CFCR. Our data also indicate that cancer outcomes may be better in patients developing prolonged and severe inflammatory side effects of CPI therapy.

The clinical and immunologic implications of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for patients with cancer receiving systemic anticancer therapy have introduced a multitude of clinical challenges and academic controversies. This review summarizes the current evidence, discussion points, and recommendations regarding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with a focus on patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). More specifically, we summarize the theoretical concepts and available objective data regarding the relationships between ICIs and the antiviral immune response, along with recommended clinical approaches to the management of melanoma and RCC patient cohorts receiving ICIs throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional insights regarding the use of ICIs in the setting of current and upcoming COVID-19 vaccines and broader implications toward future pandemics are also discussed.

While our knowledge of the evolutionary features of primary tumors has grown exponentially over the last few years our understanding of evolution of metastases is more limited and many open questions remain, regarding the timing of metastatic dissemination, the acquisition of metastatic competence and the underpinning of the variety of metastatic phenotypes observed in the clinic from latent metastases to solitary and oligo-metastases to widespread metastases. We have leveraged unique translational protocols that allow interrogation of tumor evolution from the earliest stages of diseases to death to address some of these questions. In the context of renal cell cancers we show that the mode of evolution at the primary tumor site determines the tempo and distribution of systemic metastases; that the features that distinguish metastasis-competent clones included genome instability and aneuploidy; and that metastatic competence often emerges in the centre of the primary tumor. In the context of melanoma we observe a wide spectrum of metastatic seeding that includes organ-specific metastatic clones, monophyletic and polyphyletic seeding and polyclonal mixing at metastatic sites. We observe progressive increase in aneuploidy and occurrence of whole genome doubling as melanoma metastases progress and resist treatment suggesting this as a a mechanism of immune-evasion and treatment resistance. Citation Format: Samra Turajlic. Understanding evolution of metastatic disease in renal cancer and melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr SY02-02.

The emerging mycotoxin fusaproliferin is produced by Fusarium proliferatum and other related Fusarium species. Several fungi from other taxonomic groups were also reported to produce fusaproliferin or the deacetylated derivative, known as siccanol or terpestacin. Here, we describe the identification and functional characterization of the Fusarium proliferatum genes encoding the fusaproliferin biosynthetic enzymes: a terpenoid synthase, two cytochrome P450s, a FAD-oxidase and an acetyltransferase. With the exception of one gene encoding a CYP450 (FUP2, FPRN_05484), knock-out mutants of the candidate genes could be generated, and the production of fusaproliferin and intermediates was tested by LC-MS/MS. Inactivation of the FUP1 (FPRN_05485) terpenoid synthase gene led to complete loss of fusaproliferin production. Disruption of a putative FAD-oxidase (FUP4, FPRN_05486) did not only affect oxidation of preterpestacin III to terpestacin, but also of new side products (11-oxo-preterpstacin and terpestacin aldehyde). In the knock-out strains lacking the predicted acetyltransferase (FUP5, FPRN_05487) fusaproliferin was no longer formed, but terpestacin was found at elevated levels. A model for the biosynthesis of fusaproliferin and of novel derivatives found in mutants is presented.

FGFR2 fusions, amplifications, and mutations are oncogenic drivers that occur across multiple tumor types. Clinical efficacy observed with pan-FGFR inhibitors has validated the driver status of FGFR2 in FGFR2 fusion-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), however, FGFR1-mediated toxicities (hyperphosphatemia, tissue mineralization) and the emergence of on-target FGFR2 resistance mutations limit the efficacy of pan-FGFR inhibitors. To overcome these limitations, we designed RLY-4008, a potent and highly selective, FGFR2 inhibitor. Despite significant investment in traditional structure-based drug design, selective targeting of FGFR2 has not been achieved. We leveraged differences in conformational dynamics between FGFR2 and other FGFR isoforms observed through molecular dynamics simulations to enable the design of RLY-4008. RLY-4008 inhibits FGFR2 with low nanomolar potency and demonstrates > 200-fold selectivity over FGFR1, and > 80- and > 5000-fold selectivity over FGFR3 and FGFR4, respectively, in biochemical assays. Additionally, RLY-4008 demonstrates high kinome selectivity for FGFR2 against a panel of > 400 human kinases. RLY-4008 has strong activity against primary and acquired FGFR2 resistance mutations in cellular assays, and potent antiproliferative effects on FGFR2-altered human tumor cell lines. In vivo, RLY-4008 demonstrates dose-dependent FGFR2 inhibition and induces regression in multiple human xenograft tumor models, including FGFR2 fusion-positive ICC, gastric, and lung cancers, FGFR2-amplified gastric cancer, and FGFR2-mutant endometrial cancer. Strikingly, RLY-4008 induces regression in an FGFR2 fusion-positive ICC model harboring the FGFR2V564F gatekeeper mutation and an endometrial cancer model harboring the FGFR2N549K mutation, two mutations that drive clinical progression on current pan-FGFR inhibitors. In the FGFR2V564F model, pan-FGFR inhibitors are ineffective, even at maximally tolerated doses. Notably, treatment of these tumors with RLY-4008 induces rapid regression and restores body weight. In rat and dog toxicology studies, RLY-4008 is well tolerated and is not associated with hyperphosphatemia or tissue mineralization at exposures significantly above those required to induce regression in all models. In contrast to pan-FGFR inhibitors, RLY-4008 is highly selective for FGFR2 and demonstrates strong activity against FGFR2 resistance mutations, suggesting that RLY-4008 may have broader therapeutic potential via preventing and overcoming therapeutic resistance. Together, these data and the favorable pharmaceutical properties of RLY-4008 strongly support its clinical development in FGFR2-altered tumors. Citation Format: Jessica Casaletto, Dejan Maglic, B. Barry Toure, Alex Taylor, Heike Schoenherr, Brandi Hudson, Kamil Bruderek, Songping Zhao, Patrick O9Hearn, Nastaran Gerami-Moayed, Demetri Moustakas, Roberto Valverde, Lindsey Foster, Hakan Gunaydin, Pelin Ayaz, Dina Sharon, Donald Bergstrom, James Watters. RLY-4008, a novel precision therapy for FGFR2-driven cancers designed to potently and selectively inhibit FGFR2 and FGFR2 resistance mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1455.

ABSTRACT Introduction The need to individualize a drug dosage and adjust it to a patient’s physiological and/or pathophysiological status is rarely satisfied in routine clinical practice, primarily because of complexity of the adjustment task. Areas covered The aim of this article is to shed light to basic principles of drug dosage individualization in the most frequent clinical states that affect pharmacokinetics of drugs. The principles are derived from published clinical studies conducted on diverse patient populations, using non-compartmental pharmacokinetic model. Expert opinion Simple, but sufficiently exact, way to calculate appropriate drug dose for a patient is the one based on target average steady-state concentration and non-compartmental pharmacokinetic model. If target steady-state drug concentration and dosage interval are considered fixed, maintenance dose could be adjusted on the basis of expected changes of total drug clearance and bioavailability, while loading dose should be related to changes of volume of distribution and bioavailability. Relative increase or decrease of these pharmacokinetic parameters in regard to normal values in healthy persons is translated to relative (percentual) increase or decrease of maintenance and loading doses recommended in the drug monograph.