ABSTRACT Introduction: High intensity cutaneous stimulus transiently suppresses tonic voluntary muscle activity resulting in cutaneous silent period (CSP). Aim: The aim of our study was to evaluate the normal values of an onset latency L1, a late latency L2 and a duration of CSP after stimulating sensory fibres of the median nerve. Material and Methods: This prospective study was performed at the Neurology Department, Clinical Center of Sarajevo University in period from January 1st 2013 to December 1st 2013. In our study we examined 61 subjects. The group included our relatives, coworkers and friends. The informed consent from testing subjects was obtained. Results: The origin of silent period is stimulation of small A-delta nerve fibres. The pre-synaptic or post-synaptic interruption of the electrical volley to motor neurons is discussed. Median values of muscle activity suppression in healthy female is 55.0 ms (45.0-74.0) and 59.0 ms (52.0-67) male subjects. There is a correlation between the onset latency L1and the late L2 latency (p‹0.03). In the on-going study it seems that delay of L1 and shorter muscle activity suppression might provide a sign of small nerve fibres involvement. Conclusion: The use of CSP improves the value of neurophysiology examination.

Quality is assessed on the basis of adequate evidence, while best results of the research are accomplished through scientific knowledge. Information contained in a scientific work must always be based on scientific evidence. Guidelines for genuine scientific research should be designed based on real results. Dynamic research and use correct methods of scientific work must originate from everyday practice and the fundamentals of the research. The original work should have the proper data sources with clearly defined research goals, methods of operation which are acceptable for questions included in the study. When selecting the methods it is necessary to obtain the consent of the patients/respondents to provide data for execution of the project or so called informed consent. Only by the own efforts can be reached true results, from which can be drawn conclusions and which finally can give a valid scholarly commentary. Text may be copied from other sources, either in whole or in part and marked as a result of the other studies. For high-quality scientific work necessary are expertise and relevant scientific literature, mostly taken from publications that are stored in biomedical databases. These are scientific, professional and review articles, case reports of disease in physician practices, but the knowledge can also be acquired on scientific and expert lectures by renowned scientists. Form of text publications must meet standards on writing a paper. If the article has already been published in a scientific journal, the same article cannot be published in any other journal with a few minor adjustments, or without specifying the parts of the first article which is used in another article. Copyright infringement occurs when the author of a new article, with or without mentioning the author, uses a substantial portion of previously published articles, including past contributions in the first article. With the permission of the publisher and the author, another journal can re-publish the article already published. In that case, that is not plagiarism, because the journal states that the article was re-published with the permission of the journal in which the article is primarily released. The original can be only one, and the copy is a copy, and plagiarism is stolen copy. The aim of combating plagiarism is to improve the quality, to achieve satisfactory results and to compare the results of their own research, rather than copying the data from the results of other people's research. Copy leads to incorrect results. Nowadays the problem of plagiarism has become huge, or widespread and present in almost all spheres of human activity, particularly in science. Scientific institutions and universities should have a center for surveillance, security, promotion and development of quality research. Establishment of rules and respect the rules of good practice are the obligations of each research institutions, universities and every individual researchers, regardless of which area of science is being investigated. There are misunderstandings and doubts about the criteria and standards for when and how to declare someone a plagiarist. European and World Association of Science Editors (EASE and WAME), and COPE - Committee on Publishing Ethics working on the precise definition of that institution or that the scientific committee may sanction when someone is proven plagiarism and familiarize the authors with the types of sanctions. The practice is to inform the editors about discovered plagiarism and articles are withdrawn from the database, while the authors are put on the so-called black list. So far this is the only way of preventing plagiarism, because there are no other sanctions.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most common sexually transmitted disease (STD) worldwide. HPV is a small, double-stranded DNA virus that infects mucosal and coetaneous epithelia trough tiny cuts and abrasion, exposed by the cells of the basal layer. If diagnosed on time HPV can be successfully treated, however, in some cases it can lead to the development of tumor. Most of cervical tumors contain HPV DNA, and majority of them contain high-risk types HPV16 and HPV18. Different risk factors are associated with HPV infection, including behavioral and biological predispositions. Aim of this study is to genotype potentially infected patients on high-risk types HPV DNA and to correlate the results with patient’s different biological and lifestyle factors. For this purpose 20 gynecological smear samples were collected from women, previously subjected to the survey. Methodology included DNA extraction and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results showed that out of 20 patients five were positive for high risk HPV. Four of five positive patients were positive on HPV16 type of which one had HPV16 together with others high risk types. One of five positive patients was positive on HPV18 type and other high risk types not identified. Final outcome indicates the correlation of potentially endangered patients with specific sexual behavior and lifestyles, and furthermore represent the general consensus and awareness level this disease has on the