Jejunal diverticulosis is a rare condition that often presents asymptomatically, but can occasionally lead to severe complications, such as obstruction, perforation or bleeding. We report a case of an incarcerated ventral hernia resulting from massive jejunal diverticulosis, an unusual cause of bowel obstruction. An 80-year-old female patient presented with acute abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. Physical examination revealed a tender, irreducible mass in the epigastric region. Exploratory surgery was performed and confirmed the presence of multiple jejunal diverticula, with one segment incarcerated in the epigastric hernia. The patient underwent successful surgical repair, including liberation of the affected jejunal segment and hernia repair. This case highlights the importance of considering jejunal diverticulosis in the differential diagnosis of bowel obstruction, and emphasizes the need for prompt surgical intervention in cases of complicated diverticulosis. Early diagnosis and appropriate management are critical inpreventing the severe morbidity and mortality associated with this condition.

Abstract Adrenocortical nodular hyperplasia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors are rare conditions, and their simultaneous occurrence in a single patient poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Here, we present the case of a 39-year-old female patient who underwent surgical resection for concurrent adrenocortical nodular hyperplasia and GIST on the posterior part of the gastric fundus. The patient presented with symptoms of hyperaldosteronism and malignant hypertension, leading to the discovery of these two distinct tumors. Preoperative evaluation revealed normal laboratory findings and hormone levels, except for hyperaldosteronism and hypertension. The surgical intervention included left suprarenal gland removal and wedge resection of the gastric tumor. The patient experienced a successful outcome without intraoperative complications and remained normotensive during follow-up visits, with sustaining hormonal balance. This case underscores the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and tailored surgical planning in managing complex neoplastic conditions.

Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a condition with various etiological factors, marked by the sudden onset of inflammation in the pancreatic tissue. Predicting the severity and potential mortality of AP involves analyzing clinical data alongside laboratory tests and imaging. Among several grading methods with strong predictive capabilities for illness severity and mortality, the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score is notable. This study aims to explore the potential role of laboratory markers, specifically red cell distribution width (RDW), RDW/platelet (PLT) ratio, and mean platelet volume (MPV), in predicting disease severity, with patients being stratified according to the BISAP scoring system. Materials and methods This research included 161 patients hospitalized at Cantonal Hospital Zenica in Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina, with a diagnosis of AP. The BISAP score was determined based on laboratory and radiological analyses. This score was used to evaluate potential correlations between laboratory findings such as RDW, RDW/PLT ratio, and MPV. Results The age range was significantly higher in patients with BISAP scores ≥3 (68 years, 64-76) compared to those with BISAP scores <3 (59.5 years, 42.75-69) (p = 0.000). RDW values were also significantly higher in patients with BISAP scores ≥3 (15.6%, 14-16.9) compared to those with BISAP scores <3 (13.5%, 13-14.1) (p = 0.000). Hospital stay duration was significantly longer for patients with BISAP scores ≥3 (9 days, 6-11) compared to those with BISAP scores <3 (5 days, 5-7) (p = 0.000). Additionally, the RDW/PLT ratio was significantly lower in patients with BISAP scores <3 (0.063 ± 0.02) compared to those with BISAP scores ≥3 (0.09 ± 0.059) (p = 0.012). Conclusion Our results indicate a significant difference in RDW/PLT ratios between patient severity groups based on BISAP scores (scores <3 vs. ≥3). This suggests that the RDW/PLT ratio may serve as a useful predictor for assessing the severity of AP. However, further research is needed to explore the full potential of the RDW/PLT ratio in evaluating AP patients.

Abstract Background Many surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines recommend against their routine use owing to a lack of clear clinical benefit. This study aimed to describe international variation in intraperitoneal drain placement and the safety of this practice. Methods COMPASS (COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery) was a prospective, international, cohort study which enrolled consecutive adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery (February to March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included: rate and time to diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections; rate of surgical site infections (SSIs); time to discharge; and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade at least III). After propensity score matching, multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate the independent association of the secondary outcomes with drain placement. Results Overall, 1805 patients from 22 countries were included (798 women, 44.2 per cent; median age 67.0 years). The drain insertion rate was 51.9 per cent (937 patients). After matching, drains were not associated with reduced rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 2.23; P = 0.287) or earlier detection (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 0.33 to 2.31; P = 0.780) of collections. Although not associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR 1.09, 0.68 to 1.75; P = 0.709), drains were associated with delayed hospital discharge (HR 0.58, 0.52 to 0.66; P < 0.001) and an increased risk of SSIs (OR 2.47, 1.50 to 4.05; P < 0.001). Conclusion Intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery is not associated with earlier detection of postoperative collections, but prolongs hospital stay and increases SSI risk.

Summary Background Congenital anomalies are the fifth leading cause of mortality in children younger than 5 years globally. Many gastrointestinal congenital anomalies are fatal without timely access to neonatal surgical care, but few studies have been done on these conditions in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared outcomes of the seven most common gastrointestinal congenital anomalies in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries globally, and identified factors associated with mortality. Methods We did a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of patients younger than 16 years, presenting to hospital for the first time with oesophageal atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, intestinal atresia, gastroschisis, exomphalos, anorectal malformation, and Hirschsprung's disease. Recruitment was of consecutive patients for a minimum of 1 month between October, 2018, and April, 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, clinical status, interventions, and outcomes using the REDCap platform. Patients were followed up for 30 days after primary intervention, or 30 days after admission if they did not receive an intervention. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality for all conditions combined and each condition individually, stratified by country income status. We did a complete case analysis. Findings We included 3849 patients with 3975 study conditions (560 with oesophageal atresia, 448 with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 681 with intestinal atresia, 453 with gastroschisis, 325 with exomphalos, 991 with anorectal malformation, and 517 with Hirschsprung's disease) from 264 hospitals (89 in high-income countries, 166 in middle-income countries, and nine in low-income countries) in 74 countries. Of the 3849 patients, 2231 (58·0%) were male. Median gestational age at birth was 38 weeks (IQR 36–39) and median bodyweight at presentation was 2·8 kg (2·3–3·3). Mortality among all patients was 37 (39·8%) of 93 in low-income countries, 583 (20·4%) of 2860 in middle-income countries, and 50 (5·6%) of 896 in high-income countries (p<0·0001 between all country income groups). Gastroschisis had the greatest difference in mortality between country income strata (nine [90·0%] of ten in low-income countries, 97 [31·9%] of 304 in middle-income countries, and two [1·4%] of 139 in high-income countries; p≤0·0001 between all country income groups). Factors significantly associated with higher mortality for all patients combined included country income status (low-income vs high-income countries, risk ratio 2·78 [95% CI 1·88–4·11], p<0·0001; middle-income vs high-income countries, 2·11 [1·59–2·79], p<0·0001), sepsis at presentation (1·20 [1·04–1·40], p=0·016), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score at primary intervention (ASA 4–5 vs ASA 1–2, 1·82 [1·40–2·35], p<0·0001; ASA 3 vs ASA 1–2, 1·58, [1·30–1·92], p<0·0001]), surgical safety checklist not used (1·39 [1·02–1·90], p=0·035), and ventilation or parenteral nutrition unavailable when needed (ventilation 1·96, [1·41–2·71], p=0·0001; parenteral nutrition 1·35, [1·05–1·74], p=0·018). Administration of parenteral nutrition (0·61, [0·47–0·79], p=0·0002) and use of a peripherally inserted central catheter (0·65 [0·50–0·86], p=0·0024) or percutaneous central line (0·69 [0·48–1·00], p=0·049) were associated with lower mortality. Interpretation Unacceptable differences in mortality exist for gastrointestinal congenital anomalies between low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries. Improving access to quality neonatal surgical care in LMICs will be vital to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 of ending preventable deaths in neonates and children younger than 5 years by 2030. Funding Wellcome Trust.

Background COVID-19 pandemic presented an unexpected challenge for the surgical community in general and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) specialists in particular. This document aims to summarize recent evidence and experts’ opinion and formulate recommendations to guide the surgical community on how to best organize the recovery plan for surgical activity across different sub-specialities after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Recommendations were developed through a Delphi process for establishment of expert consensus. Domain topics were formulated and subsequently subdivided into questions pertinent to different surgical specialities following the COVID-19 crisis. Sixty-five experts from 24 countries, representing the entire EAES board, were invited. Fifty clinicians and six engineers accepted the invitation and drafted statements based on specific key questions. Anonymous voting on the statements was performed until consensus was achieved, defined by at least 70% agreement. Results A total of 92 consensus statements were formulated with regard to safe resumption of surgery across eight domains, addressing general surgery, upper GI, lower GI, bariatrics, endocrine, HPB, abdominal wall and technology/research. The statements addressed elective and emergency services across all subspecialties with specific attention to the role of MIS during the recovery plan. Eighty-four of the statements were approved during the first round of Delphi voting (91.3%) and another 8 during the following round after substantial modification, resulting in a 100% consensus. Conclusion The recommendations formulated by the EAES board establish a framework for resumption of surgery following COVID-19 pandemic with particular focus on the role of MIS across surgical specialities. The statements have the potential for wide application in the clinical setting, education activities and research work across different healthcare systems.

Healthcare systems and general surgeons are being challenged by the current pandemic. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) aimed to evaluate surgeons’ experiences and perspectives, to identify gaps in knowledge, to record shortcomings in resources and to register research priorities. An ad hoc web-based survey of EAES members and affiliates was developed by the EAES Research Committee. The questionnaire consisted of 69 items divided into the following sections: (Ι) demographics, (II) institutional burdens and management strategies, and (III) analysis of resource, knowledge, and evidence gaps. Descriptive statistics were summarized as frequencies, medians, ranges,, and interquartile ranges, as appropriate. The survey took place between March 25th and April 16th with a total of 550 surgeons from 79 countries. Eighty-one percent had to postpone elective cases or suspend their practice and 35% assumed roles not related to their primary expertise. One-fourth of respondents reported having encountered abdominal pathologies in COVID-19-positive patients, most frequently acute appendicitis (47% of respondents). The effect of protective measures in surgical or endoscopic procedures on infected patients, the effect of endoscopic surgery on infected patients, and the infectivity of positive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were prioritized as knowledge gaps and research priorities. Perspectives and priorities of EAES members in the era of the pandemic are hereto summarized. Research evidence is urgently needed to effectively respond to challenges arisen from the pandemic.

Once coined the neglected stepchild of global health, surgical care has become an integral part of healthcare.1 Five billion people worldwide lack access to safe, timely, and affordable surgery, obstetrics, and anesthesia, causing over 18 million preventable deaths each year.2 To systematically address infrastructural and workforce shortages, and increase the accessibility of safe surgical care, National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plans (NSOAPs) are being developed around the world.3 As strategic plans embedded within countries' national health plans, NSOAPs allow for comprehensive health system strengthening across workforce, infrastructure, service delivery, financing, information management, and governance.4