The aim of this study was to analyze the Transit time flow measurement (TTFM) experience in the first 1000 CABG operations. First 1000 patients had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed in Cardiovascular Clinic, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina, between September, 1998 and September, 2003. CABG without use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-(OPCAB) was used as the preferential surgical method both because this method is reported to have equal or better results than CABG with use of CPB (ONCAB), and because of the significant cost savings realized. TTFM was routinely used in all grafts as a quality assurance measure. Criteria for a poor functioning graft were: low mean flow (MF), pulsatility index (PI) above 5 and a poor diastolic flow pattern. When no reversible cause of poor TTFM results were identified the graft was revised. A total of 1394 grafts in OPCAB group and 1478 in ONCAB group were performed. A total of 38 grafts (2,72%) in 37 patients (7,07%) were revised in OPCAB group, and 26 grafts (1,75%) in 26 patients (5,45%) in ONCAB group. 1 patient in OPCAB group needed 2 graft revisions. Graft revisions were more common in OPCAB, but with no significant difference (p=0,1035). The most frequently revised graft was LAD graft in both groups. Although the percentage of grafts revised are relatively low, it is still very important to record TTFM. More than 5% of patients in both groups needed graft revision. Although TTFM does not guarantee that grafts will stay open for a prolonged period of time we certainly believe that grafts that are occluded at the time of surgery will continue to stay occluded. TTFM is especially critical in OPCAB surgery where the technical challenge of grafting is higher then in ONCAB.
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and nitric oxide (NO) have been suggested to be in - The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in high-risk patients performed with- (ONCAB) and without -(OPCAB) use of cardiopulmonary bypass. From October 2001 till October 2005, 210 high-risk patients classified according to European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) (score =or> 5) underwent CABG in Cardiovascular Clinic, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 138 patients operated as OPCAB were compared to 72 patients operated as ONCAB. All data were entered in a patient database (DATACOR) and analyzed in SPSS. OPCAB patients received insignificantly less number of grafts than those treated by ONCAB (3,0 vs. 3,2) (p=0,071). Stroke was significantly more common in ONCAB group (2,9 vs. 11,1%) (p=0,034) while the incidence of other postoperative complications and mortality were similar. The ventilation time (4,3 vs. 6,7 hours) (p=0,007), retransfusion volume (392,7 vs. 633,7 ml) (p=0,041) and hospital stay (8,2 vs. 10,1 days) (p=0,031) was significantly less in OPCAB group. OPCAB is safe and effective in treatment of high-risk patients. Avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with reduced incidence of neurologic complications, lower intubation time, retransfusion rate and shorter hospital stay, and in our experience the preferred operative method in such patients.
METHODS There have been 784 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures performed at a new center for treating cardiovascular disease in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the surgical team has been fully trained in offpump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. All surgical patients were considered for on-pump CABG (ONCAB) and OPCAB surgical procedures. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting and robotic procedures were done as OPCAB. For multivessel median sternotomy cases, the selection criteria were arbitrary (approximately 50% were performed as ONCAB for perfusionist training). Patients who were scheduled for and began their operations as OPCAB but who were then placed on cardiopulmonary bypass during the surgical procedure were counted as conversions. The outcomes of converted patients were studied and are the subject of this report. RESULTS Of the 784 CABG procedures, 391 (49.6%) were scheduled and performed as ONCAB operations; 357 (45.5%) were performed as OPCAB; and 36 (9.2% of the originally scheduled OPCAB patients or 4.6% of the total number of CABG surgeries) were originally scheduled as OPCAB operations but were converted to ONCAB. Reasons for conversions were hemodynamic instability (21 patients), difficult revision of grafts (8), ventricular fibrillation (5), and poor native vessel (2). Outcomes of patients undergoing conversions were analyzed with respect to the conversion cause. When the cause of the conversion was mild-to-moderate hemodynamic instability or difficult graft revision (n = 27), no adverse ischemic effects were seen; however, when the cause of conversion was severe hemodynamic instability, ventricular fibrillation, or cardiac arrest (n = 9), 6 patients (66.6%) had severe ischemic complications involving the central nervous system or the myocardium. DISCUSSION Myocardial ischemia must be monitored and treated aggressively in OPCAB surgery. In patients with mild hemodynamic instability, conversion did not adversely affect outcome. In patients with severe hemodynamic compromise and cardiac arrest, serious complications of cerebral and myocardial ischemia were observed. The appropriate timing of conversion is essential.
Nema pronađenih rezultata, molimo da izmjenite uslove pretrage i pokušate ponovo!
Ova stranica koristi kolačiće da bi vam pružila najbolje iskustvo
Saznaj više