Logo

Publikacije (295)

Nazad
M. Scali, Q. Ciampi, Eugenio Picano, E. Bossone, F. Ferrara, R. Citro, P. Colonna, M. Costantino et al.

BackgroundThe effectiveness trial “Stress echo (SE) 2020” evaluates novel applications of SE in and beyond coronary artery disease. The core protocol also includes 4-site simplified scan of B-lines by lung ultrasound, useful to assess pulmonary congestion.PurposeTo provide web-based upstream quality control and harmonization of B-lines reading criteria.Methods60 readers (all previously accredited for regional wall motion, 53 B-lines naive) from 52 centers of 16 countries of SE 2020 network read a set of 20 lung ultrasound video-clips selected by the Pisa lab serving as reference standard, after taking an obligatory web-based learning 2-h module (http://se2020.altervista.org). Each test clip was scored for B-lines from 0 (black lung, A-lines, no B-lines) to 10 (white lung, coalescing B-lines). The diagnostic gold standard was the concordant assessment of two experienced readers of the Pisa lab. The answer of the reader was considered correct if concordant with reference standard reading ±1 (for instance, reference standard reading of 5 B-lines; correct answer 4, 5, or 6). The a priori determined pass threshold was 18/20 (≥ 90%) with R value (intra-class correlation coefficient) between reference standard and recruiting center) > 0.90. Inter-observer agreement was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficient statistics.ResultsAll 60 readers were successfully accredited: 26 (43%) on first, 24 (40%) on second, and 10 (17%) on third attempt. The average diagnostic accuracy of the 60 accredited readers was 95%, with R value of 0.95 compared to reference standard reading. The 53 B-lines naive scored similarly to the 7 B-lines expert on first attempt (90 versus 95%, p = NS). Compared to the step-1 of quality control for regional wall motion abnormalities, the mean reading time per attempt was shorter (17 ± 3 vs 29 ± 12 min, p < .01), the first attempt success rate was higher (43 vs 28%, p < 0.01), and the drop-out of readers smaller (0 vs 28%, p < .01).ConclusionsWeb-based learning is highly effective for teaching and harmonizing B-lines reading. Echocardiographers without previous experience with B-lines learn quickly.

S. Stojkovic, S. Juricic, M. Dobric, M. Nedeljković, V. Vukčević, D. Orlić, G. Stanković, M. Tomasevic et al.

The objective of the study was to evaluate major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after successful versus failed percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (PCI-CTO).Limited data are available on long-term clinical follow-up in the treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO).Between January 2009 and December 2010 PCI-CTO was attempted in 283 consecutive patients with 289 CTO lesions. Procedural success was 62.3% and clinical follow-up covered 83% (235/283) of the study population with a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 59-74).The total incidence of MACE was 57/235 (24.3%), and was significantly higher in the procedural failure group than in the procedural success group (33/87 (37.9%) versus 24/148 (16.2%), P < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients with successful PCI-CTO compared to failed PCI-CTO (10.8% versus 20.7%, P < 0.05). Also, the rate of cardiovascular death in the procedural failure group (14.9%) was slightly higher than that in the procedural success group (7.4%, P = 0.066). The rate of TVR was statistically higher in the procedural failure group (P < 0.009). Propensity score-adjusted Cox regression showed that procedural success remained a significant predictor of MACE (adjusted HR 0.402; 95% CI 0.196-0.824; P = 0.013).Our study emphasizes the importance of CTO recanalization in improving long-term outcome including all-cause mortality with a borderline effect on cardiovascular mortality.

M. Tesic, A. Djordjevic-Dikic, V. Giga, J. Stepanović, M. Dobric, I. Jovanović, M. Petrovic, Z. Mehmedbegović et al.

Background: Treatment of nonculprit coronary stenosis during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction may be beneficial, but the mode and timing of the intervention are still controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the significance and prognostic value of preserved coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in patients with nonculprit intermediate stenosis early after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: Two hundred thirty patients with remaining intermediate (50%–70%) stenosis of non‐infarct‐related arteries, in whom CFVR was performed within 7 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention, were prospectively enrolled. Twenty patients with reduced CFVR and positive results on stress echocardiography or impaired fractional flow reserve underwent revascularization and were not included in further analysis. The final study population of 210 patients (mean age, 58 ± 10 years; 162 men) was divided into two groups on the basis of CFVR: group 1, CFVR > 2 (n = 174), and group 2, CFVR ≤ 2 (n = 36). Cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization of the evaluated vessel were considered adverse events. Results: Mean follow‐up duration was 47 ± 16 months. Mean CFVR for the whole group was 2.36 ± 0.40. There were six adverse events (3.4%) related to the nonculprit coronary artery in group 1, including one cardiac death, one ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction, and four revascularizations. In group 2, there were 30 adverse events (83.3%, P < .001 vs group 1), including two cardiac deaths, two ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarctions, and 26 revascularizations. Conclusions: In patients with CFVR > 2 of the intermediate nonculprit coronary lesion, deferral of revascularization is safe and associated with excellent long‐term clinical outcomes. HIGHLIGHTSTDE CFVR provides useful information on the functional status of coronary arteries.We performed TDE CFVR of the intermediate (50%‐70%) nonculprit coronary stenosis.TDE CFVR > 2 is associated with excellent long‐term clinical outcomes.Findings contribute to ongoing debate over the best management of nonculprit lesions.

M. Polovina, Dijana Đikić, A. Vlajković, M. Vilotijević, Ivan Milinkovic, M. Ašanin, M. Ostojić, A. Coats et al.

B. Parapid, N. Danchin, V. Kanjuh, M. Stojanović, O. Nedeljković-Arsenović, B. Obrenovic-kircanski, D. Simic, J. Moschandreas et al.

E. Spitzer, M. Frei, Serge Zaugg, Susanne Hadorn, H. Kelbaek, M. Ostojić, A. Baumbach, D. Tüller et al.

Background Rehospitalizations (RHs) after ST‐elevation myocardial infarction carry a high economic burden and may deteriorate quality of life. Characterizing patients at higher risk may allow the design of preventive measures. We studied the frequency, reasons, and predictors for unplanned cardiac and noncardiac RHs in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results In this post‐hoc analysis of the COMFORTABLE AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction; NCT00962416) trial including 1137 patients, unplanned cardiac and noncardiac RHs occurred in 133 (11.7%) and in 79 patients (6.9%), respectively, at 1 year. The most frequent reasons for unplanned cardiac RHs were recurrent chest pain without evidence of ischemia (20.4%), recurrent chest pain with ischemia and coronary intervention (16.9%), and ischemic events (16.9%). Unplanned noncardiac RHs occurred most frequently attributed to bleeding (24.5%), infections (14.3%), and cancer (9.1%). On multivariate analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction (22% increase in the rate of RHs per 10% decrease; P=0.03) and angiographic myocardial infarction Syntax score (34% increase per 10‐point increase; P=0.01) were independent predictors of unplanned cardiac RHs. Age emerged as the only independent predictor of unplanned noncardiac RHs. Regional differences for unplanned cardiac RHs were observed. Conclusions Among ST‐elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of a randomized, clinical trial, unplanned cardiac RHs occurred in 12% with recurrent chest pain being the foremost reason. Unplanned noncardiac RHs occurred in 7% with bleeding as the leading cause. Left ventricular ejection fraction and Syntax score were independent predictors of unplanned cardiac RHs and identified patient subgroups in need for improved secondary prevention. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00962416.

M. Petrovic, N. Bošković, V. Giga, I. Rakocevic, D. Trifunovic, M. Dobric, M. Tesic, S. Aleksandric et al.

J. Rakočević, D. Orlić, O. Mitrović-Ajtić, M. Tomasevic, M. Dobric, N. Zlatić, D. Milašinović, G. Stanković et al.

N. Bošković, M. Petrovic, V. Giga, I. Rakočević, S. Zivković, S. Dedić, S. Aleksandrić, M. Dobric et al.

S. Aleksandric, A. Djordjevic-Dikic, B. Beleslin, B. Parapid, G. Teofilovski-Parapid, J. Stepanović, D. Simic, I. Nedeljkovic et al.

Nema pronađenih rezultata, molimo da izmjenite uslove pretrage i pokušate ponovo!

Pretplatite se na novosti o BH Akademskom Imeniku

Ova stranica koristi kolačiće da bi vam pružila najbolje iskustvo

Saznaj više