BackgroundIn order to influence every day clinical practice professional organisations issue management guidelines. Cross-sectional surveys are used to evaluate the implementation of such guidelines. The present survey investigated screening for glucose perturbations in people with coronary artery disease and compared patients with known and newly detected type 2 diabetes with those without diabetes in terms of their life-style and pharmacological risk factor management in relation to contemporary European guidelines.MethodsA total of 6187 patients (18–80 years) with coronary artery disease and known glycaemic status based on a self reported history of diabetes (previously known diabetes) or the results of an oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c (no diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes) were investigated in EUROASPIRE IV including patients in 24 European countries 2012–2013. The patients were interviewed and investigated in order to enable a comparison between their actual risk factor control with that recommended in current European management guidelines and the outcome in previously conducted surveys.ResultsA total of 2846 (46 %) patients had no diabetes, 1158 (19 %) newly diagnosed diabetes and 2183 (35 %) previously known diabetes. The combined use of all four cardioprotective drugs in these groups was 53, 55 and 60 %, respectively. A blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved in 68, 61, 54 % and a LDL-cholesterol target of <1.8 mmol/L in 16, 18 and 28 %. Patients with newly diagnosed and previously known diabetes reached an HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/mol) in 95 and 53 % and 11 % of those with previously known diabetes had an HbA1c >9.0 % (>75 mmol/mol). Of the patients with diabetes 69 % reported on low physical activity. The proportion of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes was low (≈40 %) and only 27 % of those with diabetes had attended diabetes schools. Compared with data from previous surveys the use of cardioprotective drugs had increased and more patients were achieving the risk factor treatment targets.ConclusionsDespite advances in patient management there is further potential to improve both the detection and management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of the depression on sexual dysfunction and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients admitted for cardiovascular rehabilitation within 3 months after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods. In all, 745 consecutive CAD patients (502 men and 243 women, aged 60.9 ± 9.3 years) admitted for cardiovascular rehabilitation within 3 months after an AMI, were enrolled in the study and divided into 4 groups according to Beck depression inventory (BDI) score range. HRQoL was estimated using the SF-36 questionnaire for total QoL and dimensions for physical and mental health [physical and mental component summary scores (PCS, MCS)]. Sexual dysfunction was assessed using the ASEX scale.ResultsThe HRQoL decreased following the range of depression, as demonstrated for significantly higher PCS in minimal compared to mild, moderate and severe depression groups (P<0.001). The MCS was significantly higher in minimal compared to mild, moderate and severe depression groups (P<0.001). The ASEX score was significantly higher in minimal, compared to mild, moderate and severe depression groups, as well as in mild and moderate compared to severe depression group. A significant association was found between depression score range and age, self-reported regular exercise, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cigarette smoking.ConclusionsDepression significantly affected HRQoL and sexual dysfunction in CAD patients, as demonstrated by the significant decrease of PCS, MCS, and significant increase of ASEX score following the range of the depression according to BDI.

Recommendations for prevention of coronary heart disease are measures that are available to both individuals and entire populations to detect diseases and faster and more successful intervention, respectively a measure directed against the progression or recurrence of diseases in people with established disease. Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease seemed to measures aimed at preventing re lapses and progression of atherosclerosis in people who already have developed disease.Modification of coronary risk factors is a key part of secondary prevention of coronary bolesti.The main risk factors remain important predictors of long-term prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. New studies on the application of measures of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease showed a high prevalence of adverse lifestyle characteristics, other risk factors and inadequate use of prophylactic drugs in patients with coronary disease. Inadequate treatment of risk factors in coronary patients is similar in Europe and other parts of the world.

Introduction European treatment guidelines in persons with known coronary heart disease (CHD) focus on adherence to antiplatelet therapy, β-blockers, ACE/ARBs, and lipid-lowering agents, with goals for blood pressure (BP) of < 140/90 mm Hg and LDL cholesterol of < 3.0 mmol/l. Data on adherence to these measures in Eastern Europe are limited. Material and methods The Third Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Coronary Prevention Study (ROSCOPS III) was conducted in 2005–2006 at 10 primary heath care centres in 601 patients (36% female, mean age 55 years) with CHD including acute myocardial infarction or ischaemia, coronary artery bypass graft, or angioplasty who were examined and interviewed at least 6 months after the event. We examined the proportion of subjects on recommended treatments and at goal for BP, LDL-C, and non-smoking. Results The proportion of subjects on recommended treatments included 61% for β-blockers, 79% for ACE/ARBs, 63% for lipid-lowering agents and 74% for antiplatelet therapy. Only 30% of subjects were on all four of these treatments. 59% of subjects had BP at goal of < 140/90 mm Hg and 33% were controlled to < 130/80 mm Hg, 41% for LDL-C, and 88% were non-smokers. Improvements were seen in lipid-lowering and ACE/ARB drug use and non-smoking status from an earlier survey (ROSCOPS II) in 2002–2003. Conclusions Our data show, despite improvement over recent years, that many persons with CHD in the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina are neither on recommended treatments nor at target for BP and/or LDL-C. Improved efforts targeted at both physicians and patients to address these issues are needed.

Patients who have survived myocardial infarction (MI), compared to the general population, have an increased risk of reinfarction, myocardial revascularization, and death. In this study we investigated the prognostic significance of the predictors of the risk for adverse coronary events in 118 patients, both male and female, with a confirmed diagnosis of MI in the last 3 years. The predictors of reinfarction, revascularization and death in patients who survived MI were: poor adherence to hypolipemics (hazard ratio [HR] 3.06, p=0.006), physical inactivity (HR 2.22, p=0.056), the number of variable risk factors (HR 1.29, p=0.025), and age (HR 1.06, p=0.007). After the inclusion of the invariable risk factors in the model of multivariant analysis, the following factors were singled out as significant predictors of the risk: gender (HR 3.86, p=0.0015), physical inactivity (HR 2.38, p=0.007), change in the level of triglycerides (HR 1.49, p=0.040), change in the number of variable risk factors (HR 1.41, p=0.0007), and age (HR 1.05, p=0.009). A 3-year follow-up of the patients who survived the first MI and who were enrolled in this study of secondary prevention demonstrated that physical inactivity, the number of variable risk factors and age significantly contributed to an increased risk of reinfarction, revascularization, and death.