Logo

Publikacije (119)

Nazad

Background: The Renal Registry of Bosnia and Herzegovina systematically collects national data on kidney replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This report summarizes 2 decades of registry data (2002-2022), showing trends in incidence, prevalence, modality distribution, and patient outcomes. Methods: Data were obtained annually from 30 dialysis centers across the country. Incidence, prevalence, and survival rates for hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation were calculated per million population (pmp). Descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed using SPSS 25. Results: Between 2002 and 2022, the number of dialysis centers increased from 18 to 30, and the total treated population rose by 43.5% (from 1687 to 2421 patients). Hemodialysis remained the predominant modality (80.4%), while PD accounted for only 3.0% of all dialysis patients. The incidence rate in 2022 was 118.9 pmp, and the prevalence reached 685.6 pmp. The leading causes of ESKD were diabetic nephropathy (29.5%) and hypertensive nephropathy (13.1%). The crude mortality rate among dialysis patients in 2022 was 13.2%, primarily due to cardiovascular disease. By the end of 2022, a total of 402 patients lived with a functioning kidney graft. Conclusion: Over the past 2 decades, Bosnia and Herzegovina has experienced steady growth in its dialysis population and gradual improvements in registry coverage. However, the country continues to face challenges, including low utilization of PD and limited transplantation activity. Strengthening early chronic kidney disease detection and expanding organ donation programs remain key national priorities.   Cite this article as: Resić H, Rebić D, Turković AM. The renal registry of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Turk J Nephrol. Published online May 11, 2026. doi: 10.10.5152/turkjnephrol.2026.25988.

Marin W F Hoekstra, Rianne Boenink, M. Bonthuis, Brittany A Boerstra, Megan E Astley, Í. R. Montez De Sousa, N. Gjorgjievski, H. Resić et al.

ABSTRACT The European Renal Association (ERA) Registry collects data on patients with kidney failure receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT). This paper presents a summary of the ERA Registry Annual Report 2023, and focuses specifically on comparisons by age. The complete ERA Registry Annual Report 2023 is available in the Supplementary information. For 2023, data were collected from 34 countries in Europe and countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea. Using these data, incidence and prevalence of KRT, kidney transplantation rates, survival probabilities, and expected remaining lifetimes were calculated. In 2023, the ERA Registry covered 519 million people in the participating countries. The incidence of KRT was 151 per million population (pmp). Among incident patients, 29% were aged ≥75 years, 64% were male, and the most common primary renal disease (PRD) was diabetes mellitus (22%). Most patients (83%) started KRT with haemodialysis (HD), 11% started with peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 6% underwent pre-emptive kidney transplantation. On 31 December 2023, the prevalence of KRT was 1101 pmp. Among prevalent patients, 24% were aged ≥75 years, 62% were male, and the most common PRD was of miscellaneous origin (18%). Moreover, 56% of prevalent patients received HD, 5% received PD, and 39% were living with a functioning graft. In 2023, the kidney transplantation rate was 43 pmp, with 69% of kidneys coming from deceased donors. For patients starting KRT between 2014 and 2018, 5-year survival probability was 51%. The proportions of incident and prevalent patients aged ≥75 varied considerably across European countries. In addition, incident patients aged ≥75 were more often male, and had more often hypertension as PRD compared with younger patients. Only 1% of incident patients aged ≥75 received a pre-emptive kidney transplant, while among prevalent patients of the same age, 22% was living with a functioning graft.

M. Bonthuis, A. Kramer, S. Bakkaloğlu, J. Helve, N. Gjorgjievski, H. Resić, Anders Åsberg, Nicos Mitsides et al.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) practices in Europe are heterogeneous, with apparent differences between Western and Central/Eastern Europe. However, time trends in KRT incidence and prevalence in Central and Eastern Europe are not previously reported. Therefore, we aimed to describe trends in incidence and prevalence of KRT in Central and Eastern Europe from 2010 to 2021. METHODS Data on incident and prevalent KRT patients from 19 Central and Eastern European countries between the years 2010 and 2021 were derived from the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry. Time trends were calculated using JoinPoint regression. RESULTS Overall, KRT incidence increased with 1.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): +0.7 to + 2.6%) per year from 106.3 per million population (pmp) in 2010 to 119.6 pmp in 2019. However, trends differed within the region. While in Bosnia and Herzegovina KRT incidence significantly decreased from 2010 to 2019, it remained stable in nine and increased in eight countries. The overall KRT prevalence increased with 5.1% (95% CI: +4.5 to + 5.7%) per year from 426.2 pmp in 2010 to 651.2 pmp in 2019. KRT prevalence increased in all countries, except for Belarus where it remained stable, and was mainly attributable to increases in the prevalence of kidney transplantation. The COVID-19 pandemic did not have a major impact on KRT incidence and prevalence in the region, as most trends remained until 2021. CONCLUSIONS Although we found an overall increase in KRT incidence and prevalence in the region, large country variations remain, much larger than observed in Western Europe. The results of this study can help to define country-specific priorities for the optimization of KRT care in Central and Eastern Europe.

V. Stel, N. Chesnaye, Rianne Boenink, Brittany A Boerstra, Megan E Astley, S. Methven, Line Heylen, H. Resić et al.

ABSTRACT Background This article compares the incidence and prevalence of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), kidney transplantation rates and mortality on KRT between Europe and the USA, including sex comparisons. Methods Data were derived for 2022 from the population-based European Renal Association (ERA) Registry and the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Results In 2022, the KRT incidence in the USA [388.7 per million population (pmp)] was 2.7-fold higher than in Europe (146.2 pmp), with a greater difference for women (3.2-fold) than for men (2.4-fold). The proportion of women initiating KRT was lower in Europe (35%) than in the USA (41%). Between 2013 and 2022, the KRT incidence in Europe was stable in women (+0.1% annually) but increased in men (+1.1%). In the USA, the KRT incidence increased similarly in women (+0.2%) and men (+0.3%). On 31 December 2022, the KRT prevalence was 2-fold (women 2.2-fold, men 1.9-fold) higher in the USA (2444.2 pmp) than in Europe (1218.6 pmp). The proportion of women was lower in Europe (38%) than in the USA (41%). The kidney transplantation rate was 1.7-fold higher in the USA (79.1 pmp) than in Europe (45.4 pmp), 1.9-fold for women and 1.7-fold for men, with women accounting for 37% of the recipients versus 39% in the USA. The KRT mortality rate was 1.5 times higher in the USA [145.0 per 1000 patient-years (py)] compared with Europe (100.5 per 1000 py): 1.6-fold for women and 1.4-fold for men. In Europe, mortality was lower for women receiving KRT (93.7 per 1000 py) than for men (104.6 per 1000 py), whereas in the USA the reverse was true (women 148.9 per 1000 py, men 142.2 per 1000 py). Conclusion The US had a notably higher KRT incidence, prevalence, kidney transplantation rate and mortality compared with Europe. Differences between Europe and the USA were larger for women than for men.

N. Prohić, Belma Paralija, Halma Resić, E. Begić

AIM Lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used for an assessment of volume overload in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and those undergoing dialysis. The aim of this study was to analyse whether the initial use of LUS in evaluating volume status could benefit patients by optimizing haemodialysis treatment and improving their clinical status. METHODS The study included 50 haemodialysis patients in stage V of ESKD with the diagnosis of ischaemic heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) or midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF). The assessment of volume status was verified solely by LUS (along with the analysis of B lines as measures of volume status). The specified laboratory parameters were performed initially, after three, and after six months. RESULTS The number of B-lines on LUS were decreased during the six-month follow-up compared to baseline, indicating a reduction in volume overload due to the LUS-guided protocol. Statistically significant differences were observed in the average creatinine (p=0.001) and parathormone (PTH) (p=0.003) levels over the six-month monitoring period. Significant differences were also noted in triglyceride (p=0.000) and potassium (p=0.02) levels. No significant differences were found in the values of other monitored parameters. CONCLUSION In haemodialysis patients diagnosed with heart failure, LUS can aid the achievement of a more efficient volume reduction by decreasing B-lines, which are indicative of congestion. Our study also demonstrated beneficial effects of LUS on potassium and parathormone levels.

F. Masnic, H. Resić, A. Dzubur, A. Bečiragić, A. Ćorić, N. Prohic, E. Tahirovic

The aim of the study was to elucidate predictors associated with the initial choice of vascular access (VA) type. The secondary aim was to determine the initial VA's median utilization time and the factors governing it. This prospective cohort study included 387 hemodialysis (HD) patients admitted to the Clinic for Hemodialysis, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, in consecutive order between January 2006 and December 2016. We selected the primary predictors for the initial VA type using a random forest algorithm. We further quantified factors governing the initial choice of VA: temporary catheters (TC), compared to arteriovenous fistula (AVF), using multivariate logistic regression. Finally, we used log-rank and Cox regression models to estimate the median time on each initial VA and find predictors governing it. Of the 387 patients, 265 (68,5%) used TC at dialysis initiation and 122 (31,5 %) AVF. Predictors of the TC's vs. AVF's initial use were older age (OR=1.02, CI=1.0, 1.03, p=0.03) and primary cause of CKD, particularly diabetes, compared to all other causes of kidney disease (CKD). Median time on initial AVF was 57.0 months (95%CI =36.9, 64.1), and on initial TC 4.99 months (95%CI =2.69, 8.48). Younger age (HR=.98,95%CI=.97, .99, p=.01), male sex (HR=1.51, 95%CI=1.05, 2.19, p=.03), and hypertension (HR=1.63, 95%CI=1.13,2.36, p=.01) predicted median time on initial TC, while older age (HR for patients>70years = 1.86, 95%CI=1.09, 3.17, p=.02), and diabetes (HR=1.97, 95%CI=1.19, 3.24, p=.01), predicted median time on initial AVF. These results point to late VA referrals and delays in transitioning to permanent VA.

Talia Weinstein, Nadine Vogelsang, Sandor Sonkodi, Itzchak Slotki, B. Martín-Carro, David Lappin, Jorge B Cannata-Andía, Uyen Huyn-Do et al.

The shortage of applications for fellowships in nephrology is a worldwide challenge. This is the first survey to explore in Europe the reasons physicians choose (and do not choose) a career in nephrology. An anonymous questionnaire was sent to the presidents of societies that are members of the European Renal Association (ERA), who invited trainees and nephrologists to respond. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.26. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were compared by Student's t-test or by one-way ANOVA. Responders included 516 (49%) females and 542 (51%) males. They comprised 278 (26%) trainees, and 780 (74%) nephrologists. The majority (64%) believe that students have an unfavourable perception of nephrology. For trainees, nephrology is not considered an attractive option due to ‘chronically ill patients’ (35%), ‘lack of contact during undergraduate training’ (37%), ‘nephrology is too challenging’ (38%), ‘poor remuneration’ (22%), ‘negative role models’ (15%), and ‘long working hours’ (14%). The factors with the greatest impact on choosing a career include a positive role model (46%), practical experience during medical school and early postgraduate training (42%). Trainees emphasize that work–life balance is very important for the younger generation. A strong mentorship along with early engagement is associated with a higher likelihood of pursuing a career in nephrology. It is crucial to create a strategy that will provide a positive experience, renew the interest in nephrology careers and ensure enough nephrologists to treat the growing number of patients with kidney disease.

Alberto Ortiz, A. Kramer, Gema Ariceta, O. L. Rodríguez Arévalo, A. C. Gjerstad, C. Santiuste, S. Trujillo-Alemán, P. Ferraro et al.

ABSTRACT Background Inherited kidney diseases (IKDs) and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are causes of kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT) that major renal registries usually amalgamate into the primary renal disease(PRD) category ‘miscellaneous’ or in the glomerulonephritis or pyelonephritis categories. This makes IKDs invisible (except for polycystic kidney disease) and may negatively influence the use of genetic testing, which may identify a cause for IKDs and some CAKUT. Methods We re-examined the aetiology of KRT by composing a separate IKD and CAKUT PRD group using data from the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry. Results In 2019, IKD-CAKUT was the fourth most common cause of kidney failure among incident KRT patients, accounting for 8.9% of cases [IKD 7.4% (including 5.0% autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease), CAKUT 1.5%], behind diabetes (23.0%), hypertension (14.4%) and glomerulonephritis (10.6%). IKD-CAKUT was the most common cause of kidney failure among patients <20 years of age (41.0% of cases), but their incidence rate was highest among those ages 45–74 years (22.5 per million age-related population). Among prevalent KRT patients, IKD-CAKUT (18.5%) and glomerulonephritis (18.7%) were the two most common causes of kidney failure overall, while IKD-CAKUT was the most common cause in women (21.6%) and in patients <45 years of age (29.1%). Conclusion IKD and CAKUT are common causes of kidney failure among KRT patients. Distinct categorization of IKD and CAKUT better characterizes the epidemiology of the causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and highlights the importance of genetic testing in the diagnostic workup of CKD.

A. Kramer, K. Jager, N. Chesnaye, Julia Kerschbaum, Kristine Hommel, Jordi Comas Farnés, S. T. Alemán, Rafael Santamaría et al.

ABSTRACT Background In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused disruptions in kidney replacement therapy (KRT) services worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 on the incidence of KRT, kidney transplantation activity, mortality and prevalence of KRT across Europe. Methods Patients receiving KRT were included from 17 countries providing data to the European Renal Association Registry. The epidemiology of KRT in 2020 was compared with average data from the period 2017–2019. Changes occurring during the first and second waves of the pandemic were also explored. Results The incidence of KRT was 6.2% lower in 2020 compared with 2017–2019, with the lowest point (−22.7%) during the first wave in April. The decrease varied across countries, was smaller in males (−5.2%) than in females (−8.2%) and was moderate for peritoneal dialysis (−3.7%) and haemodialysis (−5.4%) but substantial for pre-emptive kidney transplantation (−23.6%). The kidney transplantation rate decreased by 22.5%, reaching a nadir of −80.1% during the first wave, and was greatest for living donor kidney transplants (−30.5%). While in most countries the kidney transplantation rate decreased, in the Nordic/Baltic countries and Greece there was no clear decrease. In dialysis patients, mortality increased by 11.4% and was highest in those 65–74 years of age (16.1%), in those with diabetes as the primary renal disease (15.1%) and in those on haemodialysis (12.4%). In transplant recipients, the mortality was 25.8% higher, but there were no subgroups that stood out. In contrast to the rising prevalence of KRT observed over the past decades across Europe, the prevalence at the end of 2020 (N = 317 787) resembled that of 2019 (N = 317 077). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on the incidence of KRT, kidney transplant activity, mortality of KRT and prevalence of KRT in Europe with variations across countries.

C. Alparslan, J. Małyszko, F. Caskey, M. Aleckovic-Halilovic, Z. Hrušková, Silvia Arruebo, A. Bello, S. Damster et al.

Delivery of care for kidney failure (KF) globally has a significant disparity; even in some countries, it means end of life for the person. The International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) tries to address gaps in KF care and standardize global nephrology care. From the third iteration of the ISN-GKHA, we present data for countries in the ISN Eastern and Central Europe region. The median prevalences of chronic kidney disease (12.8%) and treated KF (873.5 pmp) were higher than the global rates, respectively. Hemodialysis was the most preferred modality for KF in adults, whereas kidney replacement therapy was more balanced in children. Although most of the countries in the region had lower-middle-income and upper-middle-income levels, health expenditures for kidney health care were almost generally covered publicly. Nephrologists were responsible for the medical kidney care of people with KF in all countries. There was adequate infrastructure to provide all kinds of treatment for kidney care in the region. Regional characteristics such as high levels of obesity, smoking, and Balkan nephropathy as an endemic disease coupled with a shortage of workforce and finance continued to affect kidney care in the region negatively. By making organizational and legislative arrangements, partnerships with national authorities and societies may accelerate the improvement of kidney health care in the region.

V. Stel, Rianne Boenink, Megan E Astley, Brittany A Boerstra, D. Radunović, R. Skrunes, J. C. Ruíz San Millán, M. F. Slon Roblero et al.

ABSTRACT Background This paper compares the most recent data on the incidence and prevalence of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), kidney transplantation rates, and mortality on KRT from Europe to those from the United States (US), including comparisons of treatment modalities (haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KTx)). Methods Data were derived from the annual reports of the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry and the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). The European data include information from national and regional renal registries providing the ERA Registry with individual patient data. Additional analyses were performed to present results for all participating European countries together. Results In 2021, the KRT incidence in the US (409.7 per million population (pmp)) was almost 3-fold higher than in Europe (144.4 pmp). Despite the substantial difference in KRT incidence, approximately the same proportion of patients initiated HD (Europe: 82%, US: 84%), PD (14%; 13%, respectively), or underwent pre-emptive KTx (4%; 3%, respectively). The KRT prevalence in the US (2436.1 pmp) was 2-fold higher than in Europe (1187.8 pmp). Within Europe, approximately half of all prevalent patients were living with a functioning graft (47%), while in the US, this was one third (32%). The number of kidney transplantations performed was almost twice as high in the US (77.0 pmp) compared to Europe (41.6 pmp). The mortality of patients receiving KRT was 1.6-fold higher in the US (157.3 per 1000 patient years) compared to Europe (98.7 per 1000 patient years). Conclusions The US had a much higher KRT incidence, prevalence, and mortality compared to Europe, and despite a higher kidney transplantation rate, a lower proportion of prevalent patients with a functioning graft.

S. ElHafeez, A. Kramer, M. Arıcı, M. Arnol, Anders Åsberg, Samira Bell, J. Belliere, Carmen Díaz Corte et al.

ABSTRACT Background Primary glomerular disease (PGD) is a major cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) leading to kidney replacement therapy (KRT). We aimed to describe incidence (trends) in individuals starting KRT for ESKD due to PGD and to examine their survival and causes of death. Methods We used data from the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry on 69 854 patients who started KRT for ESKD due to PGD between 2000 and 2019. ERA primary renal disease codes were used to define six PGD subgroups. We examined age and sex standardized incidence, trend of the incidence and survival. Results The standardized incidence of KRT for ESKD due to PGD was 16.6 per million population (pmp), ranging from 8.6 pmp in Serbia to 20.0 pmp in France. Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) had the highest incidences, of 4.6 pmp and 2.6 pmp, respectively. Histologically non-examined PGDs represented over 50% of cases in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Romania and were also common in Greece, Estonia, Belgium and Sweden. The incidence declined from 18.6 pmp in 2000 to 14.5 pmp in 2013, after which it stabilized. All PGD subgroups had 5-year survival probabilities above 50%, with crescentic glomerulonephritis having the highest risk of death [adjusted hazard ratio 1.8 (95% confidence interval 1.6–1.9)] compared with IgAN. Cardiovascular disease was the most common cause of death (33.9%). Conclusion The incidence of KRT for ESKD due to PGD showed large differences between countries and was highest and increasing for IgAN and FSGS. Lack of kidney biopsy facilities in some countries may have affected accurate assignment of the cause of ESKD. The recognition of the incidence and outcomes of KRT among different PGD subgroups may contribute to a more individualized patient care approach.

Brittany A Boerstra, Rianne Boenink, Megan E Astley, M. Bonthuis, S. A. Abd ElHafeez, F. A. Arribas Monzón, Anders Åsberg, P. Beckerman et al.

ABSTRACT Background The European Renal Association (ERA) Registry collects data on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This paper is a summary of the ERA Registry Annual Report 2021, including a comparison across treatment modalities. Methods Data was collected from 54 national and regional registries from 36 countries, of which 35 registries from 18 countries contributed individual patient data and 19 registries from 19 countries contributed aggregated data. Using this data, incidence and prevalence of KRT, kidney transplantation rates, survival probabilities and expected remaining lifetimes were calculated. Result In 2021, 533.2 million people in the general population were covered by the ERA Registry. The incidence of KRT was 145 per million population (pmp). In incident patients, 55% were 65 years or older, 64% were male, and the most common primary renal disease (PRD) was diabetes (22%). The prevalence of KRT was 1040 pmp. In prevalent patients, 47% were 65 years or older, 62% were male, and the most common PRDs were diabetes and glomerulonephritis/sclerosis (both 16%). On 31 December 2021, 56% of patients received haemodialysis, 5% received peritoneal dialysis, and 39% were living with a functioning graft. The kidney transplantation rate in 2021 was 37 pmp, a majority coming from deceased donors (66%). For patients initiating KRT between 2012–2016, 5-year survival probability was 52%. Compared to the general population, life expectancy was 65% and 68% shorter for males and females receiving dialysis, and 40% and 43% shorter for males and females living with a functioning graft.

Ayşe Balat, Ş. Eren, M. Menzilcioğlu, İlhan Bahsi, Ilkay Dogan, A. Acıduman, Bilal Çiğ, Tsvetoslav Georgiev et al.

Dear Colleagues, We are delighted to share another issue (September 2023, Volume 29, Issue 3) of the European Journal of Therapeutics (Eur J Ther). We believe this issue’s valuable and exciting works will be read with interest. As you will notice at first glance, you will see that this issue contains many editorials and letters to the editor, unlike the previous issues. As the new editorial team, we aim to publish current developments, interesting notes, or important historical anecdotes in medicine as Editorials, Special Editorials, or Letters to the Editor. We would like to inform you that you can submit all of your articles that meet these criteria to our journal. In this editorial, we would like to share the developments that we think are important for Eur J Ther, since our previous editorial [1]. First, we would like to share that the Eur J Ther is approved for inclusion in ERIH PLUS [2]. Moreover, the Eur J Ther now also appears in the Journal Section of the ResearchGate [3]. In this way, it will be possible to follow the Eur J Ther through ResearchGate. We wish to inform you that our editorial team is diligently striving to deliver enhanced advancements in the forthcoming editions. Another significant development is that an application to the Index Copernicus was submitted for the Eur J Ther on July 31, 2023 [4]. In the previous issue, it was reported that some of the cited references made to the previous articles published in the Eur J Ther were not reflected in the Web of Science, and applications via “data changes form” were made to correct them [1]. Most of these applications have been completed, updated in the Web of Science database, and corrected missing references. With these corrections and new citations in the last three to four months, the average per-item value (total number of citations for all articles divided by the number of articles) of the Eur J Ther has increased from 0.52 to 0.78 [5]. In addition, the journal’s H-Index has risen from 8 to 10. The current metrics of Eur J Ther in the Web of Science are as follows, as of August 16, 2023 [5]. Total number of publications: 800 (between 2007 to 2023) Citing Articles (total): 593 Citing Articles (without self-citations): 558 Times Cited (total): 620 Times Cited (without self-citations): 570 Average per item: 0.78 (620/800) H-Index: 10 Although these metrics may be insufficient for Eur J Ther, which has been published for over thirty years, we, the New Editorial Team, anticipate that we can achieve better levels in the long run with our updated policies. Another significant development is that the Journal Impact Factor value of the Eur J Ther was calculated for the first time, and this value was 0.3. As is known, the Web of Science calculated Journal Impact Factors for the first time for journals in the E-SCI index as of 2023 [6]. Although a Journal Impact Factor of 0.3 is not satisfactory, it is not bad for a journal whose Journal Impact Factor is calculated for the first time. On the other hand, we believe that this value will increase in the coming years, as essential and valuable studies will be published in our journal. The previous issue reported that there are significant changes in the Editorial Board of Eur J Ther [1, 7]. We are pleased to inform you that we continue to expand our editorial team in this issue. Information about our esteemed editors, who have recently joined our team, is below. Ricardo Grillo, DDS, MBA, MSc, is a new Editorial Board Member of the Eur J Ther for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Dr Grillo is the Head of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at IPESP (Brasília). He has more than 20 years of experience in Orthognathic Surgery, Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial Aesthetics. He is also a court expert in the topic. His special interest is related to new technologies including algorithms, virtual surgical planning, CAD and biotechnology. Figen Govsa (Gokmen), MD, finished her higher education at the Faculty of Medicine at Dokuz Eylul University in Izmir between 1982 and 1988. In 1989, she worked as a general practitioner at the Cal Health Center in Denizli Province. From 1990 to 1992, she served as an assistant at the Department of Anatomy at Ege University’s Faculty of Medicine. She worked as an associate professor at the Department of Anatomy between 1996 and 2001, and since 2001, she has been a professor. She has served in various faculty and upper management positions in Ege University’s institutional structure, continuing her education-focused administrative roles in several councils and committees at the Faculty of Medicine. She has contributed to undergraduate and postgraduate education across Ege University’s faculties, mentoring master’s, doctoral, and specialist students, helping them become academics in the field of anatomy. Her research interests include clinical anatomy (surgical anatomy, head and neck surgery, vascular surgery, reconstructive surgery), radio-anatomy, anatomy teaching, and personalized treatment algorithms. She is the founder of the Digital Imaging and Three-Dimensional Modeling Laboratory- Ege 3D Lab (www.ege3dlab.com), where personalized surgical plans have increased surgical success in complex cases involving orthopedics, general surgery, neurosurgery, eye surgery, radiation oncology, and thoracic surgery. With 150 SCI-expanded indexed academic journal articles, she has served as editor and chapter author for several scientific books published by national and international publishers. She has been an executor and researcher on numerous national projects in collaboration with national and international scientists. She is the Education and Terminology theme editor of the Surgical Radiological Anatomy journal and serves as an editor and reviewer for many foreign journals. She was the only anatomist from Turkey to be included in Stanford University's list of the World's Most Influential Scientists. Her joint publication with Prof. Dr. Yelda Pınar, titled "Anatomy of the superficial temporal artery and its branches: its importance for surgery", was ranked among the top 50 most-cited articles in the face rejuvenation theme by Mayo Clinic's Department of Plastic Surgery since 1950. It's the only study from Turkey in the "Landmarks in Facial Rejuvenation Surgery: The Top 50 Most Cited Articles. Aesthet Surg J, 2020." From 2010 to 2012, Govsa contributed as a member of the TÜBA Turkish Medical Terminology Dictionary Working Group and was invited to rejoin the TÜBA working group starting in 2021. Since its establishment, she has been a member of the Turkish Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy Association, serving on its Qualification Board and Ethical Committee. She is also a member of the European Clinical Anatomy Association (EACA). Özgür Kasapçopur, MD, is a Professor in Pediatrics at Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Pediatrics, and is currently Head of Pediatric Rheumatology. He serves as the Chairman of the Institutional Review Board and Clinical Research Ethical Committee of Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty. Professor Kasapçopur received his undergraduate education in Medicine at Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty and also completed here both his residency and fellowship in the Department of Pediatrics. Professor Kasapçopur is a member of the Pediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS), the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO), the Turkish Pediatric Association and the Turkish National Society of Pediatric Rheumatology. Professor Kasapçopur’s research interests include vaccine response, cytokine pathway, and medical ethics, with clinical emphases on juvenile idiopathic arthritis, familial Mediterranean fever, autoinflammatory disease and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis and scleroderma. Professor Kasapçopur has published 83 book chapters in Turkish medical textbooks, and more than 315 original peer-reviewed articles (and case reports) in medical journals. The h-index of Professor Kasapçopur is 55 in Google Scholar and 43 in Web of Science. He had more than 8800 citations in the Web of Science. Professor Kasapcopur is Editor-in-Chief of Turkish Archives Pediatrics. Additionally, Professor Kasapcopur is the Associate Editor of Archives of Rheumatology, Frontiers in Pediatrics, and Case Report in Pediatrics. He is also on the editorial board of many scientific national and international journals. Harry Pantazopoulos, PhD is a faculty member in the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Dr Pantazopoulos received his A.L.M. degree from Harvard University and his doctoral degree in Neurobiology from Northeastern University in Boston. He trained as a postdoctoral fellow and a Junior Faculty at Mclean Hospital, Harvard Medical School before joining the University of Mississippi. The research of the Pantazopoulos lab is focused on identifying the neuropathological correlates of psychiatric disorders with an emphasis on the role of the extracellular matrix and circadian rhythms. He pursues these questions using a combination of human postmortem and animal model approaches. His long-term research goal is to develop a foundation of changes in neurocircuitry in several diseases, including Autism Spectrum Disorders, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression and Substance Use Disorders, that he can leverage to develop more effective treatments. In addition, he aims to identify basic biological mechanisms that will provide insight into how the circadian system and the extracellular matrix regulate neural functions in a brain region-specific manner, linked to specific behaviors. Ghada Shahrour, PhD, PMHCNS, RN is a faculty member at the Faculty of Nursing in Jordan University of Science and Technology. She is an associate professor in the field of psychiatric nursing and currently is the Chairman of the Community and Mental Health N

Nema pronađenih rezultata, molimo da izmjenite uslove pretrage i pokušate ponovo!

Pretplatite se na novosti o BH Akademskom Imeniku

Ova stranica koristi kolačiće da bi vam pružila najbolje iskustvo

Saznaj više